COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests With Self-Collected vs Health Care Worker-Collected Nasal and Throat Swab Specimens: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Self- or health care worker (HCW)-collected nasal swab specimens are the preferred sampling method to perform rapid antigen testing for COVID-19, but it is debated whether throat specimens can improve test sensitivity. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of self- and HCW-collected nasal vs throat swab specimens for COVID-19 rapid antigen testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This per-protocol multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 15 through March 25, 2022. The participants, individuals aged 16 years or older requesting a COVID-19 test for diagnostic or screening purposes, had 4 specimens collected for individual testing at 1 of 2 urban COVID-19 outpatient test centers in Copenhagen, Denmark. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to self-collected or HCW-collected nasal and throat swab specimens for rapid antigen testing. Additional HCW-collected nasal and throat swab specimens for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used as the reference standard. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was sensitivity to diagnose COVID-19 of a self- vs HCW-collected nasal and throat specimen for rapid antigen testing compared with RT-PCR. Results: Of 2941 participants enrolled, 2674 (90.9%) had complete test results and were included in the final analysis (1535 [57.4%] women; median age, 40 years [IQR, 28-55 years]); 1074 (40.2%) had COVID-19 symptoms, and 827 (30.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Health care worker-collected throat specimens had higher mean sensitivity than HCW-collected nasal specimens for rapid antigen testing (69.4% [95% CI, 65.1%-73.6%] vs 60.0% [95% CI, 55.4%-64.5%]). However, a subgroup analysis of symptomatic participants found that self-collected nasal specimens were more sensitive than self-collected throat specimens for rapid antigen testing (mean sensitivity, 71.5% [95% CI, 65.3%-77.6%] vs 58.0% [95% CI, 51.2%-64.7%]; P < .001). Combining nasal and throat specimens increased sensitivity for HCW- and self-collected specimens by 21.4 and 15.5 percentage points, respectively, compared with a single nasal specimen (both P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that a single HCW-collected throat specimen had higher sensitivity for rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 than a nasal specimen. In contrast, the self-collected nasal specimens had higher sensitivity than throat specimens for symptomatic participants. Adding a throat specimen to the standard practice of collecting a single nasal specimen could improve sensitivity for rapid antigen testing in health care and home-based settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05209178.

The Prevalence of HPV in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is an important risk factor in a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), but the association with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas (OCSCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of HPV infection in OCSCC. A systematic search on PubMed and EMBASE was performed, including articles assessing the prevalence of HPV-positive (HPV+) OCSCC published from January 2017 to December 2022. OCSCC was considered HPV+ by the detection of HPV DNA, HPV RNA, and/or p16 overexpression in the tumor mass. A meta-analysis was made determining the overall HPV+ OCSCC prevalence. We included 31 studies comprising 5007 patients from 24 countries. The study size ranged from 17 to 940 patients. The HPV+ OCSCC proportion variated widely and ranged from 0% to 37%. Tumors in the tongue were the predominant sublocation for HPV in the oral cavity. The meta-analysis revealed that the overall HPV+ OCSCC prevalence is 6% (95% CI; 3-10%), and only one study found HPV and OCSCC significantly associated. Thus, HPV may not be a necessary or a strong risk factor in OCSCC oncogenesis, and the possibility of a site misclassification of a mobile tongue with the root of the tongue cannot be excluded.

Nasopharyngeal malignancies in Denmark diagnosed from 1980 to 2014.

OBJECTIVES: Nasopharyngeal malignancies are reported having decreasing incidence and reduced mortality. This study provides a nationwide update of the incidence and survival in Denmark. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Danish Cancer Registry (DCR) and Central Population Register (CPR) were used to identify all patients registered with nasopharyngeal malignancies between 1980 and 2014 in Denmark. We evaluated the age-adjusted incidence rate (AAIR), average annual percent change (AAPC) and relative survival (RS) and also constructed age-population-cohort (APC) models. RESULTS: 911 patients were identified with a male:female ratio of 2.2:1, a median age of 57.7 years (range 2.8-98.3 years) and an overall median follow-up time of 2.7 years (range 0-37 years). The AAIR was 0.39 cases per 100 000 in 1980 and 0.28 cases per 100 000 in 2014 with an AAPC of -3.2 (95% CI: -7.5; 1.2, p = 0.1). The overall 1-year and 5-year RS rates were 76.3% and 42.1%, respectively. We found a significant age effect in the APC model for the incidence of nasopharyngeal malignancies, but no significant cohort or period effects. CONCLUSION: The incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinomas has slightly decreased over the last four decades, however insignificantly. Meanwhile, the relative survival has increased significantly in Denmark since 1980. The cause of improved relative survival might be attributed to altered treatment practices.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Follicular Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Background: In risk assessment of recurrence, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) are often grouped together as differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, while risk factors affecting recurrence of PTC are well established, risk factors for recurrence of FTC are not. This systematic review examines risk factors for recurrence of FTC and evaluates their significance. Methods: A systematic search on PubMed and Embase was performed in September 2020, including studies evaluating risk factors for recurrence of FTC. A quality assessment of the enrolled studies was performed. Results: Nine studies (n = 1544 patients) from eight countries were included. The average recurrence rate was 13.6%, and distant metastasis (DM) constituted 64.8% of the recurrent cases. The risk factors examined were sex, age at diagnosis, primary tumor size, degree of invasiveness, focality, positive resection margin, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and DM at diagnosis. Risk factors correlated with recurrence of FTC were age older than 45 years, primary tumor size above 40 mm, widespread invasion, multifocality, positive resection margin, LN metastasis, and DM at diagnosis. Sex was not a statistically significant risk factor. Conclusions: We identified seven risk factors associated with recurrence of FTC. Age and multifocality were found to be of greater impact regarding recurrence risk of FTC compared with PTC. Future research needs to address the impact of different risk factors for recurrence of FTC particularly including age, primary tumor size, angioinvasion, and mutational status.